Pluripo

Acceptable Use Policy

This Acceptable Use Policy supplements the Terms of Service and governs how you may use Pluripo. Conduct that violates this policy may result in suspension or termination of your account.

1. No illegal activity

You may not use Pluripo to plan, facilitate, or carry out any activity that is unlawful in your jurisdiction or in the jurisdictions where Pluripo or its providers operate. This includes, without limitation, the creation of malware, the targeting of individuals for harassment, the production of child sexual abuse material, fraud, the unauthorized intrusion into systems you do not own or have permission to test, and the infringement of intellectual property rights.

2. Upstream provider policies apply to your traffic

Pluripo proxies your requests to third-party large-language-model providers. Any traffic you send through Pluripo is also subject to the use policies of those providers (most notably OpenRouter, whose policies cover the underlying models Pluripo currently routes to). If a category of use is prohibited by an upstream provider, it is prohibited on Pluripo regardless of whether this policy enumerates it explicitly.

3. No reverse-engineering of internal routing

Pluripo’s internal routing — how it selects which model handles which kind of request — is part of the product’s confidential design. You may not:

Ordinary use of the product — including comparing outputs, reporting bugs, and discussing your experience — is not restricted by this section.

4. No resale or sublicensing

A Pluripo account is for the use of one person. You may not resell, sublicense, share credentials for, or operate Pluripo as a service offered to third parties. If you want to use Pluripo on behalf of a team or organization, contact us at support@pluripo.com; team accounts are not currently offered but are on the roadmap.

5. No abusive automation

Agentic coding loops are an intended use of Pluripo and are not restricted. What is restricted is automation that issues sustained maximum-throughput traffic without regard to whether the work is productive — runaway loops, infinite retry storms, and load-generation harnesses targeting Pluripo. The 16-concurrent-stream cap is in place to limit the damage of accidental loops; intentional attempts to maximize concurrent traffic for its own sake are not permitted.

6. Security and integrity

You may not probe, scan, or test the vulnerability of any Pluripo system without prior written authorization, attempt to bypass authentication, rate limits, or billing enforcement, or disrupt service for other users. Responsible disclosure of vulnerabilities discovered in normal use is welcomed at security@pluripo.com.

7. Enforcement

Violations may result in temporary suspension, permanent termination of the account, forfeiture of unused subscription allowance and top-up balance (per the Terms of Service), and, where the conduct warrants it, referral to law enforcement.

Pluripo reserves the right to determine in good faith whether a use violates this policy. Flagrant or repeat violations may result in termination without notice or refund.

8. Reporting violations

To report a suspected violation of this policy by another user, email abuse@pluripo.com. For copyright and intellectual-property complaints, see Section 9 below.

Pluripo relays your prompts to large-language-model providers and returns the result to you. It does not host a public library of user content — one account’s prompts and outputs are never visible to other users — so there is no publicly posted material for Pluripo to remove on request, as a content-hosting platform would.

If you believe that model output returned through Pluripo, or any other material associated with the Service, infringes your copyright or other intellectual-property rights, email dmca@pluripo.com with a description of the work and the alleged infringement. We review every credible complaint and act on it as appropriate, including by restricting an account that uses the Service to infringe. Because model output is generated by the third-party providers described in Section 2, some intellectual-property concerns are most effectively raised directly with those providers under their terms.